![\"\"](\"https:\/\/unionspace.co.th\/doing-business-living-bangkok\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/ChatGPT-Image-Jul-6-2026-09_14_46-AM-819x1024.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\nWhy It Might Not Be a Bubble (The Bull Case)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
The other side argues this time is genuinely different \u2014 and the data backs much of it up. Unlike the dot-com era, when countless companies had no revenue and no path to profit, today’s AI leaders generate enormous real profits. The “Magnificent Seven” enjoy net margins above 25%, roughly double the S&P 500 average, and Nvidia alone posted around $99 billion in trailing profit at a 53% net margin.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Valuations, while high, aren’t dot-com crazy. Nvidia trades at roughly 24\u201326 times expected earnings \u2014 elevated, but a world away from Cisco’s 472 times earnings at the 2000 peak.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Crucially, the spending is being funded from strength, not debt. Companies have funded their AI capital expenditures almost entirely from earnings rather than borrowing \u2014 a sign the build-out isn’t creating the kind of systemic financial fragility that turns a correction into a crisis. Goldman Sachs and J.P. Morgan both argue the growth is fundamentally justified, with real demand for AI chips coming from paying enterprise customers, not speculative startups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Nuanced View: A Bubble in Parts, Not the Whole<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
The most balanced reading is that 2026 shows bubble-like conditions in specific segments rather than a market-wide speculative frenzy. Some pockets look frothy \u2014 SpaceX’s IPO valued it at over 100 times sales, and certain chip names trade at price-to-sales ratios above 30, levels that have historically preceded sharp corrections. But the profitable core of the AI economy rests on far firmer ground than the internet bubble did.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It’s also worth remembering Ray Dalio’s key distinction: a bubble forming and a bubble bursting are two different events. The “pricking” usually comes when investors are forced to sell assets to raise cash \u2014 and the most-watched trigger for that is rising US interest rates, which make future earnings less valuable and AI borrowing more expensive. Notably, June’s sell-off was set off partly by a strong jobs report that revived fears the Federal Reserve might hike rates rather than cut them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Bottom Line<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
The real question in 2026 is no longer whether AI is transformative \u2014 it’s whether today’s prices have already fully priced in that transformation. A bubble doesn’t form simply because prices rise; it forms when prices rise faster than the underlying fundamentals. AI’s fundamentals are real and profitable at the core, but the gap between trillions in spending and still-modest returns is the crack everyone is watching. Whether that gap closes with growth or with a correction may be the defining market story of the next few years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
After two years of a historic rally, 2026 has become the year investors started asking the uncomfortable question out loud: is AI a bubble? A brutal June sell-off, warnings from Wall Street’s biggest names, and valuations not seen since the dot-com era have turned a background worry into a front-page debate. Here’s what’s actually going…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":2049,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[323,384],"tags":[448,449,426],"class_list":["post-2047","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news-insights","category-tech","tag-ai","tag-nasdaq","tag-stocks"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t